Discuss all hockey and EHM-related competitions here (except the GM Challenges). This is also the place to talk about all of our community-run competitions and games.
Forum rules PLEASE NOTE: ADVERTISING A LEAGUE/COMPETITION/WEB SITE/FORUM IS NO LONGER PERMITTED ANYWHERE ON THE BLUE LINE. We have had too many people take liberties with this privilege; signing up simply to advertise their site and not actually contributing to the community. We also see a lot of bumping of threads which is really just spamming the site. Anybody that advertises anything on TBL will be permanently banned for spamming.
CHI Name…………… GS SS CH PC PA SH Ment
LW: Bobby Hull 0 0 6 5 14 15 a
C : Phil Esposito 0 0 6 6 14 14 a
RW: Ryujin 0 0 9 6 13 12 a
LD: Bobby Orr 0 0 15 15 7 3 b
RD: Paul Coffey 0 0 15 17 6 2 b
G : Tony Esposito 10 12 0 0 0 0 b
HAR Name…………… GS SS CH PC PA SH Ment
LW: CatchUp 0 0 8 8 10 14 a
C : Batdad 0 0 4 5 15 16 a
RW: Gordie Howe 0 0 10 8 12 10 a
LD: Timmi611 0 0 13 8 8 11 a
RD: Big Argon 0 0 12 13 8 7 b
G : Joe Helmer 12 10 0 0 0 0 c
MIN Name…………… GS SS CH PC PA SH Ment
LW: Loxish 0 0 4 5 13 18 a
C : Devils88 0 0 6 6 16 12 a
RW: Marion Gaborik 0 0 7 9 13 11 a
LD: Vissia 0 0 10 8 10 12 a
RD: Tasku 0 0 12 13 10 5 c
G : David Zetterman 11 11 0 0 0 0 b
MTL Name…………… GS SS CH PC PA SH Ment
LW: Ken Dryden 0 0 6 6 14 14 b
C : Jacques Lemaire 0 0 5 5 15 15 b
RW: Guy Lafleur 0 0 9 9 11 11 b
LD: Larry Robinson 0 0 18 12 7 3 b
RD: Jacques Laperriere 0 0 18 10 8 4 b
G : Patrick Roy 15 7 0 0 0 0 b
QBC Name…………… GS SS CH PC PA SH Ment
LW: Archibalduk 0 0 5 5 19 11 a
C : Loosie 0 0 4 4 13 19 a
RW: Bruins72 0 0 5 6 14 15 b
LD: JC Tremblay 0 0 18 16 3 3 b
RD: Andre Dupont 0 0 16 18 3 3 b
G : Sbufkle 14 8 0 0 0 0 a
WIN Name…………… GS SS CH PC PA SH Ment
LW: Lazion 0 0 14 11 14 1 b
C : Getzlaf15 0 0 2 3 18 17 a
RW: Gibson41 0 0 8 10 5 17 a
LD: Serge Savard 0 0 15 16 3 6 c
RD: Rookier 0 0 15 12 11 2 b
G : Calv 11 11 0 0 0 0 b
Wow! A shock defeat for Hartford! Ryuzin's change of tactics really took advantage of the Whalers' gung-ho game. Esposito and Hull both scored five points and Ryuzin got four. Batdad has now slipped to joint third in the league leaders for points.
Winnipeg struggled to find a way past bottom-placed Montreal. A win for Winnipeg would have seen them jump to third. They're still not far behind, though.
A disappointing loss for Quebec. I knew it was going to be a close game but I thought our defence would have done better. Minnesota are now challenging for the top spot with Hartford.
Fellow Quebec players, may I suggest we change tactics?I was thinking aggressive for all forwards and conservative for defencemen and goalie. Sbufkle's stronger glove than his stick suggests he might be better playing conservative rather than aggressive.
I would like some opinions on how to run the draft at the end of the season. I previously stated that the order of picks would go 6-5-4-3-2-1-1-2-3-4-5-6 (i.e. the bottom placed team picks first in the first round and last in the second round and the first placed team has the middle two picks). However, I don't think this gives the first placed team enough of a chance to defend their league title the following season. Thus I suggest the order should be 1-6-5-4-3-2-2-3-4-5-6-1. Would that be fairer? Or would it be better another way?
Hold on a sec here..no it is not. Grant Fuhr was good enough to win a few cups without any d whatsoever. Tis the goalie's fault pure and simple. He is not good enough to play firewagon hockey, which is the style of choice and is a winning style. Sorry, but Helmer you just have not been up to snuff.
What you need to remember is that in our game Ryugin...at the most Helmer had 9 shots. if he stops 50% of them...we win or tie. But well...you see his save percentage is likely about .100. And that is the issue.
Why can't anyone get my name right? I dunno, I think Fuhr did have SOME semblance of D on that team. Just like my 91/92 Pens. We were rubbish on D, but we did just enough to get by. But then again, I'm not a Whaler. I'll leave that up to you guys.
Anyway, you need to realize that this is just good old natured ribbing of our goalie. It ain't serious. Virtually nothing we say about geek hockey is serious. Why? because it is called GEEK hockey for a reason. It is silly, and we don't really care if we win or lose. But it is fun to rib guys. Just like Helmer ribs his teammates for not helping him out we rib him back when we lose by calling him a sieve.
So what? Big deal. If Helmer really cared I am sure he would say so. But anyway..back to actually having some fun and not being serious about geek hockey.