Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 1:22 am
by Gige
Tasku wrote:Hard to say, cause they look so different in the game, than at imageshack. I personally liked the first concept, looked okay for me. This one doesn't look bad either. Which ever you prefer. :dunno:
Do you think perhaps resizing the originals. I kinda leaning that they are a little big in the game i.e. take up a lot of the screen.

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:00 am
by Tasku
Like I said, I like them, so in my opinion they're fine as they are.

I'd rather have big logos, than small ones. The game is full of small text and tiny numbers, having big colourful logos is not a bad change.

That's my opinion atleast. Someone else may think differently. :dunno:

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:00 pm
by bruins72
I liked your originals better too. The larger size and the whole design concept really worked for me.

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:18 pm
by vilifyingforce
Can I ask where you found such perfect logos to work from? Straight off of each teams site?

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:55 am
by Gige
dybbuk wrote:Can I ask where you found such perfect logos to work from? Straight off of each teams site?
Well I got all of my logos from Chris Creamers Logo website.

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:22 pm
by vilifyingforce
kk.

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:22 am
by Gige
Hey there guys, glad to see you like the news items, got an updated pic, maybe its better, c&c please
New Flyers

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:48 am
by tobbehh
It looks cool

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:38 pm
by Phareux
i think i prefer the first one

Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:51 pm
by Ivan_Drago
Those look great. =D> Wish I could get those for EHM 2005.

Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:37 pm
by bruins72
Ivan_Drago wrote:Those look great. =D> Wish I could get those for EHM 2005.
Nah! You just need to take the plunge and get EHM 2007! There's so many add-ons and stuff for 2007 that you're missing out on.