Page 28 of 39
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:47 am
by Richie Daggers Crime
IceTimer wrote:What do you mean he's too big, I thought you said regen's could be a different height/weight?
The height and weight might vary a tiny bit (especially since most people ID regens at 17 or 18 when they haven't fully grown), but, for instance, 5' 8" Irbe isn't going to regen as 6' 2".
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:12 pm
by alexob18
No clue who this is... but check out his goals/assists ratio!
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:56 am
by Richie Daggers Crime
Messier?
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:00 am
by philou21
Messier can be in the regens in the game?? Never knew that.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:02 pm
by Richie Daggers Crime
In the Lidas rosters, at least the one I'm using (2.2 I think), he retires as a player right at the beginning, so yeah, he gets regenerated.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:06 pm
by alexob18
Influence is low... probably not Moose. Right height and weight though. Very well could be.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:08 pm
by philou21
Influence can vary alot even from a great captain......my Sakic and Forsberg regen are awful at influence and teamwork. Like 14-11 or 15-8.
](./images/smilies/wallbash.gif)
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:10 pm
by alexob18
Ouch... okay I feel better about it. Probably is Moose.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:37 pm
by Meyerson
Hi, iam new in this forum and have some regen. I play in Germany (DEL) with Kölner Haie
I would say it is Abstreiter. Consistency 14.
And the second is I believe Kölzig. Consistency 13.
What say the regen experts?
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:48 pm
by eternium85
morsy wrote:Does anyone know who this could be? For his age he looks pretty amazing:
Sure looks like Shanahan to me. Is his consistency around 14?
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:51 pm
by alexob18
Shanny isn't German...
Could be Kolzig, no clue on the first guy.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:49 pm
by A9L3E
alexob18 wrote:Shanny isn't German...
But he isn't referring to Meyerson's post.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:53 pm
by Richie Daggers Crime
alexob18 wrote:Ouch... okay I feel better about it. Probably is Moose.
Yeah, Influence is one of the attributes that gets randomized. Same with Work Rate. The Messier regen in my game has 16 Influence, but only 11 Work Rate.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:08 pm
by alexob18
A9L3E wrote:alexob18 wrote:Shanny isn't German...
But he isn't referring to Meyerson's post.
I realized that after a little while...
Otherwise it does look like it could be Shanny.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:06 pm
by alexob18
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:20 am
by IceTimer
He's wasting time in the AHL.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:21 am
by IceTimer
Ferraro is wasting time in the AHL.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:22 am
by philou21
At only 7.71 ratio he doesn't waste is time at all, let him another year so he could hit the 8.20, 8.50 now it would be the right time.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:04 am
by alexob18
Agreed with Phil, I usually don't call up an AHL prospect unless I have an immediate hole to fill with no chance at a trade or an FA signing or they have over an 8.50 rating.
He's 18, so I expect him to get ~8.30 next year, then near the 9.0 the year prior (when he's 20). At which point I'll call him up.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:57 am
by IceTimer
I think you are putting too much emphasis on the rating, it depends on the player, some players are all world and will have a high rating, others won't, but will put up nice numbers. You don't know how the player will do in the NHL anyway unless you try him there, 7.7 isn't a bad rating anyhow.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:00 am
by philou21
Yeah you'Re right. But for me, I prefer he get high rating in the AHL first, if in the NHL he always got like 7.50 or 7.70 I will be satisfied. I just think in the AHL it's better for is development to wait. Sometimes if I see it doesn't do anything and need him, I will try it in my team and see what he's gonna do, there's good surprises!
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:27 am
by alexob18
It's my rule of thumb. I'd rather not rush my prospects, but take my time with them. Not once have I ever rushed my prospects' development and the ones that I consider surefire - such as Ferraro - who is playing with some amazing other prospects by the way (all of my top line was in AHL scoring title contention, along with my #1 dman), I do not rush what so ever.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:01 am
by IceTimer
alexob18 wrote:It's my rule of thumb. I'd rather not rush my prospects, but take my time with them. Not once have I ever rushed my prospects' development and the ones that I consider surefire - such as Ferraro - who is playing with some amazing other prospects by the way (all of my top line was in AHL scoring title contention, along with my #1 dman), I do not rush what so ever.
Just wondering where did you draft him, and if he is already ready for the NHL you won't be rushing him, how is he able to play in the AHL at 18 btw?
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:10 am
by alexob18
USHL.
I feel as though he's not ready, especially behind Andrew Ladd, Taylor Hall and James Neal. 4th line NHL vs 1st line AHL. Better for development in AHL.
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:31 pm
by deknegt
Hey i just returned to this board after a couple of years not playing this game.
Well i just finished my first CHL season with Windsor and i found two interesting kids in the draft.
Beattie got 16 Consistency
West got 11 Consistency
I am using the newest Lidas btw.
EDIT: Apparently i can't get the IMG tags to work.