Page 4 of 5
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:26 pm
by philou21
IceTimer wrote:philou21 wrote:Rowson wrote:I drafted him at #11 in my NHL dynasty.
After a year in junior, I signed him to play back up for Luongo, and he went absent from training, so I packaged him for two first rounders >_<
Stupid move.
How is that a stupid move, his player left the team, he did not really have any other choice.
He just miss ONE training, you give him a warning and that's it. You don't give up such a prospect for one miss training, in my game Ilya Kovalchuk miss one training and i didn't trade him for that, i just give him a warning and he accept it and that never happen again. Miss a training is not left the team at all.
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:42 pm
by Rowson
philou21 wrote:IceTimer wrote:philou21 wrote:
Stupid move.
How is that a stupid move, his player left the team, he did not really have any other choice.
He just miss ONE training, you give him a warning and that's it. You don't give up such a prospect for one miss training, in my game Ilya Kovalchuk miss one training and i didn't trade him for that, i just give him a warning and he accept it and that never happen again. Miss a training is not left the team at all.
It wasn't one training. He was absent for at least 2 weeks.
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:44 pm
by philou21
Thanks for the update. 2 weeks? I never seen this before wow.

You've got your own Sergei Kostitsyn.

It's sucks for you though, the Hasek regen is always a good goalie.
EDIT: Sorry i wrote Joseph instead of Hasek. Oh and....Hasek regen is not always a good goalie.

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:46 pm
by Rowson
philou21 wrote:Thanks for the update. 2 weeks? I never seen this before wow.

You've got your own Sergei Kostitsyn.

It's sucks for you though, the Joseph regen is always a good goalie.
Yeah, luckily the picks ended up being 5th and 8th, so I picked up two players.
And Luongo's awesome

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:48 pm
by IceTimer
I'm guessing the Hasek regen was mad cause he did not want to backup Luongo.
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:05 pm
by Rowson
IceTimer wrote:I'm guessing the Hasek regen was mad cause he did not want to backup Luongo.
I signed him in the summer, and he went absent in November
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:24 pm
by IceTimer
Rowson wrote:IceTimer wrote:I'm guessing the Hasek regen was mad cause he did not want to backup Luongo.
I signed him in the summer, and he went absent in November
Was he Lu's backup until November?
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:38 pm
by Rowson
IceTimer wrote:Rowson wrote:IceTimer wrote:I'm guessing the Hasek regen was mad cause he did not want to backup Luongo.
I signed him in the summer, and he went absent in November
Was he Lu's backup until November?
Yeah. He played 3 out of the first 10 games though
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:47 pm
by IceTimer
Rowson wrote:IceTimer wrote:Rowson wrote:
I signed him in the summer, and he went absent in November
Was he Lu's backup until November?
Yeah. He played 3 out of the first 10 games though
Sounds like his personality would not stand for being the backup, so you had 2 options, you either put him in the AHL, or you trade Lu and make him the starter.
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:58 pm
by DJP19
Just found the Hasek regen in the upcoming 2010 NHL entry draft. He is only ranked at number 45 in peliminaries so he probably will move up. He has 20 in flair and reflexes and stat goes below 10. If he is ranked that high up should i wait for him or take him earlier(like first 20 picks)?
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:17 pm
by Hensel
DJP19 wrote:Just found the Hasek regen in the upcoming 2010 NHL entry draft. He is only ranked at number 45 in peliminaries so he probably will move up. He has 20 in flair and reflexes and stat goes below 10. If he is ranked that high up should i wait for him or take him earlier(like first 20 picks)?
Hows your goaltedning situation? If you have a young stud like Steve Mason than id say wait and if your goalie is Chris Osgood i'd say take him early.
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:47 am
by DJP19
i have cam ward who is now 30 with 2 yearrs left on his contract
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 11:55 am
by geckon
I know this is a quite old topic but... Is it possible that Hasek regen wasn't drafted in 2009 and isn't eligible for 2010 draft? I looked for him in 2009, now it's November 2009 and I can't find any Czech goalie with flair that high. In fact, there are only two Czech goalies with flair higher than 14 in the whole game - Prusek (33 years old, 15 flair) and Duba (28 years old, 16 flair). I used the player search for that - is there any other way to find the regen (if he's there somewhere)? Or will he just emerge next year? I use the Updated Unfaked DB and in my previous game with this DB there was Hasek regen in 2010 draft.
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 12:28 pm
by timmy_t
If you are using one of the newer Manimal Rosters they removed all of the retired players from the game instead of letting them regen. I'm pretty sure that the last db that has the regens is 4.1b, and a lot of them have random potential instead of a fixed number (-14 or -15).
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:28 pm
by geckon
timmy_t wrote:If you are using one of the newer Manimal Rosters they removed all of the retired players from the game instead of letting them regen. I'm pretty sure that the last db that has the regens is 4.1b, and a lot of them have random potential instead of a fixed number (-14 or -15).
I wrote that I use the Updated Unfaked and that I had seen Hasek's regen in a previous game with the very same database. Moreover Hasek played the first season in this game.
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 3:35 am
by geckon
Weird, I'm unable to find him even among 2011 draftees. Can anyone advise how to find him? Is it possible that he wasn't regenerated at all?
EDIT: Maybe I found him. But he has Flair only 14. However, he's acrobatic with bad stickhandling and with the right height. He has 18 Consistency. Could this be him?
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/8025/hasekregen.png
If so, should I pick him?
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 4:08 pm
by timmy_t
What database are you using right now? I didn't understand your post about the updated unfaking db, does that mean you are using the exact same db that you've seen Hasek in? Because the guy in the screenshot is not him.
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 6:19 pm
by geckon
I use this database:
http://www.ehmtheblueline.com/forums/vi ... =77&t=8241
And yes, it is the database I'd seen Hasek and his regen before (in previous game). Also there was Hasek playing the first season of this very game (the exact save). Then he retired and I awaited his regen but he apparently wouldn't come.
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 6:25 pm
by Tasku
Sometimes the search function doesn't quite work. Might be, he's out there, but the search won't find him.
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 6:32 pm
by philou21
Tasku is right. Sometimes you need to go in the league and scout yourself to search the regen you want. Even your own scouts can forget or pass those players.
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 7:46 pm
by geckon
OK, I'm trying to find him through my scouts - this one maybe?
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/5262/scr ... 308430.png
But he's too young (2012 Draft eligible) and a little too high - he should be 180 cm if height is preserved. He's acrobatic though.
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 8:40 pm
by philou21
Height can vary from a couple of cm. I would say it's him but....2012 draft doesn't work.
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 3:10 am
by timmy_t
I'm sorry if I didn't understand that you were unable to find him on the same database you had previously used. I don't think that link is Hasek, I think that it's probably Roman Chechmanek.
Also, the other guys are right with their posts. Some things vary a little bit. On these regens their height and catching hand remain the same, but everything else is a little different.
Here are 4 Hasek regens from 4 different games:

Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Sat Jun 01, 2013 2:04 pm
by geckon
Thanks. I'll continue with scouting. If I find anything I'll let you know. If he's drafted he should show in a few years anyway as an excelent prospect at another team.
Re: The Hasek regen: How low can he go?
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:07 am
by geckon
Haven't found another candidate than this one. Could it be that he was accidentaly regenerated as 14 yo instead of 16? That would explain the 2012 draft maybe.