Page 1 of 1
					
				PA & CA Chart
				Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:56 pm
				by MKoivuFan
				I tried search for potenial chart and i couldnt find it... Basically its the one that shows like if u go to hockeyfuture.com and find like player A is a 6C potenial u could go to the chart on this forum and find ok a 6C potenial is a -5 or something PA
			 
			
					
				Re: PA & CA Chart
				Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:30 pm
				by Manimal
				We used HF for rating prospects some seasons ago and someone made such a list. It wasn't perfect and the next year we did things differently.
I don't remember where it is but if it is important to you then I can take a look for it
			 
			
					
				Re: PA & CA Chart
				Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 11:54 pm
				by nino33
				I think the chart you guys are talking about is in Archi's October 10th post in this thread 
http://www.ehmtheblueline.com/forums/vi ... =45&t=9956 
			 
			
					
				Re: PA & CA Chart
				Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:35 am
				by Manimal
				
Yes, that is the one. Thanks
 
			 
			
					
				Re: PA & CA Chart
				Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 3:12 pm
				by Primis
				I've said before that that chart/post and a few others should combined and stickied somewhere as a Reference for easy locating.  It's terrible trying to hunt those threads down sometimes, and I finally just copied and pasted the info I wanted in a Google Doc and also to a .TXT file locally on my machines.  The negative PA values in particular are not something you just memorize generally.
Also, the negative PA values don't stop at -10.  IIRC they go up/down to -15, but I don't see that noted in the post.  I think the next two unlisted values are for players with high "ceilings" but that also could potentially have a much lower ceiling than normal.
			 
			
					
				Re: PA & CA Chart
				Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 5:38 pm
				by archibalduk
				Primis wrote:Also, the negative PA values don't stop at -10.  IIRC they go up/down to -15, but I don't see that noted in the post.  I think the next two unlisted values are for players with high "ceilings" but that also could potentially have a much lower ceiling than normal.
The post was written specifically for the NHL research for the TBL Rosters. I think for whatever reason we didn't want researchers to use the full negative range.