European Player Development
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 4:44 am
I run a Swedish team and noticed that many European teams have very young players playing in high-level leagues. Some players on top-level teams are as young as 17 or even 16. I signed several very young players who have good potential (according to my scouts), but I'm not sure whether to have them on my big team or assign them to my junior team. Some of these young players have good physical abilities and good skills, but have low mental attributes. Will the mental attributes improve more at a high level of competition or at the junior level?
Some of my teen-agers are very promising and have attributes better than the veterans on my team. It's tempting to throw them into my second or third lines and move the veterans down, but will this hurt the young players' development? For example, does a player's "influence" improve more when he's a big fish in a small pond or when he's a small fish in a big pond?
Note about my coaching: I have coaches who work well with youngsters on my big club, but I have no control over coaching on my junior team. I can't even see who coaches that team.
Some of my teen-agers are very promising and have attributes better than the veterans on my team. It's tempting to throw them into my second or third lines and move the veterans down, but will this hurt the young players' development? For example, does a player's "influence" improve more when he's a big fish in a small pond or when he's a small fish in a big pond?
Note about my coaching: I have coaches who work well with youngsters on my big club, but I have no control over coaching on my junior team. I can't even see who coaches that team.