NHL re-rating of attributes

Post by **Manimal** » Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:28 pm

I am swamped with roster work right now and would like any of you guys to update the attributes of the NHL-players.

Start by reading through this topichttp://www.ehmtheblueline.com/forums/vi ... =13&t=4920
I find it very good(thanks Selne for it) as it explains attributes and things regarding it.

Choose a team from the list.
Then take the excel-sheet attached to this post and put down the changes from Lidas 3.2 you'd like to see. This saves me valuable time
Please, also rate the offensive/defensive role of the players
If you want anything other changed, feel free to say so
You can also grade a non-player you think needs up- or downgrading.

PLEASE, NO HOMERISM!
I cannot read xlsx-files so please save as xls before you send them to me

Teams:
Anaheim - daelh DONE+ADDED
Boston - daelh DONE+ADDED
Buffalo - daelh DONE+ADDED
Calgary - daelh DONE+ADDED
Carolina - daelh DONE+ADDED
Chicago - daelh DONE+ADDED
Colorado - empach DONE+ADDED
Columbus - daelh DONE+ADDED
Dallas - tonait DONE+ADDED
Detroit - jetwing13 DONE+ADDED
Edmonton - WallyWallcakes DONE+ADDED
Florida - daelh DONE+ADDED
Los Angeles - daelh DONE+ADDED
Minnesota - VisualDarkness DONE
Montreal - BobBastard DONE+ADDED
Nashville - daelh DONE+ADDED
New Jersey - Leeman14 DONE+ADDED
N.Y.Islanders - daelh DONE+ADDED
N.Y.Rangers - blueshirtnParis DONE+ADDED
Ottawa - BobBastard DONE+ADDED
Philadelphia - daelh DONE+ADDED
Phoenix - daelh DONE+ADDED
Pittsburgh - daelh DONE+ADDED
St. Louis - daelh DONE+ADDED
San Jose - daelh DONE+ADDED
Tampa Bay - Geordie_Bolts DONE+ADDED
Toronto - Leeman14 DONE+ADDED
Vancouver - maxrsp DONE
Washington - maxrsp DONE
Winnipeg - maxrsp DONE

Feel free to ask anything.
Thanks everyone for your help!

WallyWallcakes · Post by **WallyWallcakes** » Wed Aug 31, 2011 3:59 pm

I'll take Edmonton

empach · Post by **empach** » Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:24 am

When do you need them done?

I'll take Colorado.

Post by **Manimal** » Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:22 am

empach wrote:When do you need them done?

I'll take Colorado.

If I could have all teams done before the season starts, then I'd be very happy

Post by **archibalduk** » Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:05 pm

I'll take Ottawa and Philly if that's okay.

Post by **Manimal** » Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:28 pm

archibalduk wrote:I'll take Ottawa and Philly if that's okay.

It sure is! Thanks.

BTW, can we put this thread a news so it shows on the start page? It might generate more interest

Geordie_Bolts · Post by **Geordie_Bolts** » Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:50 am

I'll have a go at doing Tampa Bay manimal. Happy to help!

Post by **archibalduk** » Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:55 pm

Manimal wrote:
archibalduk wrote:I'll take Ottawa and Philly if that's okay.
It sure is! Thanks.

BTW, can we put this thread a news so it shows on the start page? It might generate more interest

No problem.

Yes, I was thinking the same thing. I'll get it on the Home Page either this evening or tomorrow.

Geordie_Bolts · Post by **Geordie_Bolts** » Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:48 pm

Hi, I've downloaded the spreadsheet and have one question. Am I just re-rating the players assigned to tampa on this spreadsheet or am I doing their new additions as well. For example, Sean Bergenheim has moved on but is still listed as being at Tampa on your spread sheet and Ryan Shannon (a new addition) is still listed as a Senator. Do I update both, just Bergenheim or just Shannon? Sorry for the long-winded question just wanted some clarification

Thanks!

Post by **Manimal** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:58 am

Geordie_Bolts wrote:Hi, I've downloaded the spreadsheet and have one question. Am I just re-rating the players assigned to tampa on this spreadsheet or am I doing their new additions as well. For example, Sean Bergenheim has moved on but is still listed as being at Tampa on your spread sheet and Ryan Shannon (a new addition) is still listed as a Senator. Do I update both, just Bergenheim or just Shannon? Sorry for the long-winded question just wanted some clarification Thanks!

They are listed with the teams they played last year with.
I want you to rate the players that are with Tampa now.

Geordie_Bolts · Post by **Geordie_Bolts** » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:17 pm

Thought you would!! Thanks.

Leeman14 · Post by **Leeman14** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 5:25 pm

Hey Manimal,

Just like last year, I'll take Toronto and I'll grab New Jersey as well.

Cheers,

Leeman14

Post by **Manimal** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:14 pm

Leeman14 wrote:Hey Manimal,

Just like last year, I'll take Toronto and I'll grab New Jersey as well.

Cheers,

Leeman14

Great! Now we are focusing on the NHL-signed players. Prospects can also be done if you want to

WallyWallcakes · Post by **WallyWallcakes** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:57 am

I'm almost done, but just to clarify, we're rating this based on the 3.2 roster?

Post by **Manimal** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:26 am

WallyWallcakes wrote:I'm almost done, but just to clarify, we're rating this based on the 3.2 roster?

You don't have to base the research on any given db. Just put the values you see fit

jetwing13 · Post by **jetwing13** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:24 pm

I can take Detroit.

Just so I understand what needs to be done, I need to update the player and staff changes with anything that I see that needs an update from version 3.2, is that correct?

Post by **Manimal** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:30 pm

jetwing13 wrote:I can take Detroit.

Just so I understand what needs to be done, I need to update the player and staff changes with anything that I see that needs an update from version 3.2, is that correct?

I have already done the player movement so I am only looking for attribute and ability- values. List everything you think needs change

maxrsp · Post by **maxrsp** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:57 pm

I can take the last 3 teams on your list - Vancouver, Washington, and Winnepeg and will turn them around in a week.

bestrafer7 · Post by **bestrafer7** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:39 pm

jetwing13 wrote:I can take Detroit.

Just so I understand what needs to be done, I need to update the player and staff changes with anything that I see that needs an update from version 3.2, is that correct?

Some good prospect information sites:
http://www.redwingscentral.com/
http://www.theleftwinglock.com/

I would do the Red Wings, but now that the WHL season has started I can nail down the rosters for that league, finally!

Post by **Manimal** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:35 pm

maxrsp wrote:I can take the last 3 teams on your list - Vancouver, Washington, and Winnepeg and will turn them around in a week.

Thanks

blueshirtnParis · Post by **blueshirtnParis** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:05 am

Hey, I would be happy to help. I will take the NY Rangers.

I guess what has me confused (and maybe others) is you say 'changes' but changed from what? Can we take the latest player database and consider if any player' attributes need to be changed from what they are? Seems to me the easiest way to do it would be to scan their current attributes and suggest changes to the ones that we feel are not correct.

Also, are we looking to change current ability? In the spreadsheet you say not to touch CA but take Gaborik for example. You have him listed as a 156CA but in the Attribute guide he is specifically listed as an example for a 180CA guy. At the very least he is a 170 - 1st liner type player.

Also, can we alter PA?

Sorry if I asked to many questions, I want to get this right.

Post by **Manimal** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:40 pm

Great that you want to help!

blueshirtnParis wrote:Hey, I would be happy to help. I will take the NY Rangers.

I guess what has me confused (and maybe others) is you say 'changes' but changed from what? Can we take the latest player database and consider if any player' attributes need to be changed from what they are? Seems to me the easiest way to do it would be to scan their current attributes and suggest changes to the ones that we feel are not correct.

That is the easiest way and probably the best way.

blueshirtnParis wrote:Also, are we looking to change current ability? In the spreadsheet you say not to touch CA but take Gaborik for example. You have him listed as a 156CA but in the Attribute guide he is specifically listed as an example for a 180CA guy. At the very least he is a 170 - 1st liner type player.

The examples in the attribute guide are probably a bit dated. The values in the sheet are based on last years stats. I agree that Gaborik is more of a 170-player - when he's on. Set his CA to 170 and have his consistency not so high, and then he'll be like IRL, I think.

blueshirtnParis wrote: Also, can we alter PA?

Yes, you can alter PA

BobBastard · Post by **BobBastard** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:13 pm

I'll do Montreal. I already have half the team done for the db i'm playing now. Also, since the pre-season games are televised it's easier to get a good look/evaluation of the prospects and fringe players.

Post by **Manimal** » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:46 pm

BobBastard wrote:I'll do Montreal. I already have half the team done for the db i'm playing now. Also, since the pre-season games are televised it's easier to get a good look/evaluation of the prospects and fringe players.

Thanks!
EVERYONE! I cannot read xlsx-files so please save as xls before you send them to me

Leeman14 · Post by **Leeman14** » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:22 pm

Can anyone confirm that the maximum number of scouts contracted to a team is 15 (including the head scout position)?

Much appreciated!

NHL re-rating of attributes

NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes

Re: NHL re-rating of attributes