Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Think you're a good EHM GM? Our GM Challenges dare you to take over a team and make it a winner. The Challenge Forum and Centre are the hubs of our Challenges.

Moderator: Challenge Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
stone169
Checking Line
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:48 pm
Favourite Team: Ottawa Senators
Location: Southern Ontario

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by stone169 »

July 1st and fired most of my coaching staff except for Rolie the goalie Melanson. Fired my assistant GM. Fired two trainers. Time to overhaul this team and win the Cup in our first season. ;)
User avatar
Manimal
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 6344
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:01 am
Custom Rank: EHM Rosters Man
Favourite Team: Djurgårdens IF
Location: Karlstad, Sweden

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Manimal »

bruins72 wrote:You can't get rid of Conacher... at least not yet! :-p

To take over as GM you have to retire the temporary GM I added (TBL Challenge). Once you've retired that GM, you should be prompted to add a new one.
He's talking about Pat Conacher, GM of the Comets.

Just add yourself as GM of the Comets and he'll go away automatically
User avatar
bruins72
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 14513
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
Location: Taunton, MA

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by bruins72 »

Ah! I was thinking of the little smurfy player. :doh:
outdooral
Minor League
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:09 am

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by outdooral »

Right,
I managed to do that with Vancouver, so all good there.
But Utica shows Conacher as the GM and I cant find where to retire him
User avatar
Manimal
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 6344
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:01 am
Custom Rank: EHM Rosters Man
Favourite Team: Djurgårdens IF
Location: Karlstad, Sweden

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Manimal »

outdooral wrote:Right,
I managed to do that with Vancouver, so all good there.
But Utica shows Conacher as the GM and I cant find where to retire him
No need to. Just add a GM for Utica and he'll disappear
outdooral
Minor League
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:09 am

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by outdooral »

When i go to the add a manager screen it will only let me select an NHL team
User avatar
bruins72
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 14513
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
Location: Taunton, MA

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by bruins72 »

First you'll need to go to "Detail Level" and change the AHL to show "ALL". Then there is a dropdown in the add GM screen where it says "NHL". Click that and you should be able to choose AHL.

EDIT: This happened because when I simmed ahead for the save to work from, I wanted it to go faster, so I made it not show detail for any league but the NHL. You have to have the league on full detail to be able to take over a team.
User avatar
Manimal
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 6344
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:01 am
Custom Rank: EHM Rosters Man
Favourite Team: Djurgårdens IF
Location: Karlstad, Sweden

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Manimal »

Wow, the Comets have some bad coaches! Back to editing... No, just kidding. Save that for the future.
I'm gonna let them stay for the playoffs. That's fair to them(but they are getting fired no matter what afterwards, hehe)
mpronger
Top Prospect
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 6:03 pm

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by mpronger »

Will this be the first challenge I take part in? I think so :-) Time for something new after reaching 2035 in my first EHM:EA game, started on release day. Happy 2 month birthday for EHM:EA celebrated yesterday by the way :party:

I'll probably take over the AHL team, but can I be a "holiday GM" in the AHL? As in I'll be able to have the coach use my lines/team selection/tactics but I won't actually coach their games.
User avatar
bruins72
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 14513
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
Location: Taunton, MA

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by bruins72 »

Yes. When I controlled my AHL team I've just made the staff changes and set the lines and then went on vacation. It's just too much to manage 2 teams at once sometimes.
User avatar
Manimal
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 6344
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:01 am
Custom Rank: EHM Rosters Man
Favourite Team: Djurgårdens IF
Location: Karlstad, Sweden

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Manimal »

I'm gonna play the Comets for their end of season as the Canucks has no games anyway.
A good way to see what your signed prospects go for
outdooral
Minor League
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:09 am

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by outdooral »

Thanks,
Tried that but can only get to add manager for national mens and under 20 and NHL teams. Nothing else shows up
User avatar
bruins72
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 14513
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
Location: Taunton, MA

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by bruins72 »

Sorry.... go to "Selected Leagues" under the gear icon. Change AHL from View Only to Enhanced.
That should do it.
outdooral
Minor League
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:09 am

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by outdooral »

Thats it !!!!
Should the detail level be put back to its previous settings or left as “show all “

Thanks

Boom go the Nuks !
User avatar
bruins72
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 14513
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
Location: Taunton, MA

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by bruins72 »

I'd probably go with Show All on the AHL. :thup:
User avatar
nickflyers
Top Prospect
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:35 pm

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by nickflyers »

Great googly moogly....I may have to partake in my 1st ever challenge!
User avatar
Vadim10
TBL Rosters Researcher
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 8:03 pm
Favourite Team: Adler Mannheim / VER Selb
Location: Selb, Franconia

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Vadim10 »

Never had such problems to get rid of players I didn't want anymore as I have with the Sedin twins :D
User avatar
cstorring
Prospect
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:38 am
Favourite Team: Flames

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by cstorring »

Sorry for another question, but in this section:
Each season on June 15th the veteran age will drop. You'll have the option of trading away these veteran players or keeping them. The same restrictions apply here that applied the when you first took over the team but the age will drop
It says we have the option of trading or keeping, but also says the same restrictions apply as season 1.

Does this mean we must trade all players over the certain age each new season?

Or does it mean that IF we are going to make any trades, the trades must meet the restrictions (they must be over the veteran age, and we can only bring players 24 and under (and/or draft picks) in)?

Thanks!
User avatar
Manimal
TBL Admin Team
Posts: 6344
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:01 am
Custom Rank: EHM Rosters Man
Favourite Team: Djurgårdens IF
Location: Karlstad, Sweden

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Manimal »

cstorring wrote:Sorry for another question, but in this section:
Each season on June 15th the veteran age will drop. You'll have the option of trading away these veteran players or keeping them. The same restrictions apply here that applied the when you first took over the team but the age will drop
It says we have the option of trading or keeping, but also says the same restrictions apply as season 1.

Does this mean we must trade all players over the certain age each new season?

Or does it mean that IF we are going to make any trades, the trades must meet the restrictions (they must be over the veteran age, and we can only bring players 24 and under (and/or draft picks) in)?

Thanks!
From Season two, you don't have to trade your veterans. However, you may trade only one player under the age rule for that season.
The restrictions on what you can receive is still there
User avatar
Peter_Doherty
Hall of Fame
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
Favourite Team: New York Rangers
Location: Sweden

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Peter_Doherty »

So, can we trade for players that are out on loan on their ELC? Like that Fucale trade..
User avatar
Peter_Doherty
Hall of Fame
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
Favourite Team: New York Rangers
Location: Sweden

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Peter_Doherty »

Okey, so it took me 5 hours but i finally arrived at the draft with all my trades done :P

For the assets we had i got 3x 1st rounders (#20, #25, #30), a 3rd, a 4th and a 5th. The players i managed to get a hold of was, Kreider, Bjugstad, Dylan Olsen, Girgensons, Chris Tierney, Mikael Wikstrand, Oscar Klefbom and Adam Lowry.

I'm OK with what i got but at the same time i'm a little bit disappointed, i wanted a really good C but i just couldn't get a deal for one so i got some quantity instead, hopefully one of them steps up. I also wanted atleast one really good D but i failed there aswell, i did add some size on the wings atleast which i'm happy about and also stocked up with some 1st rounders. Would have liked a RW for one of the top lines aswell but yeah, finding the right deals is hard and time consuming and after a while i just tired out and went with what i could get.

Now on to the draft! I did not win the lottery so i will draft at #12.
User avatar
batdad
The Great One
Posts: 12616
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:46 pm
Custom Rank: Mr Technology
Favourite Team: Syracuse Bulldogs.
Location: Look behind you, you peon

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by batdad »

AS long as they are signed, yes


So my team is very interesting. Not sure I like it save for one deal I made. You can guess who I had to give up to get these guys, if they are on the same line they came in the same trade. I did not deal for a single draft pick. No fun that way.

From NYI--Brock Nelson
From SJ- Mirco Muller, Brendon Dillon
From Win-Mark Scheiffle, Jacob Trouba
From CBJ-Stephane Morin
From Ana-Richard Rakell


THat is all.


Lineup

Nelson-Scheiffle-Morin
Conacher-Bonino-Jensen
Bartschi-Rakell-Kassian
McMillan-Matthias-Vey
Dorsett (Sestito if he re-signs, not sure if he does not who it will be)

Dillon-Trouba
Stanton-Clendenning
Tanev-Weber
Sbisa

Markstrom
Lack

THere is not alot of depth on this team, and I have NO PROVEN scorers to start the year. Trouba is the big winner for me. Morin maybe too, and I love Scheiffle but it takes him a bit to get going.

We shall see....not even at draft yet, took me all day to do that.

Turned down a few deals that I could have made

Bjugstad and Kulikov out of Florida (I have had Bugle before)
Kreider and Miller out of NYR
Toffoli out of LA--had to give up too much for him, which is good, because he becomes a stud.
I thought Dallas was going to take the same deal for Nikolishin that CBJ took for Morin...targetted the two of them. But...their board vetoed the deal. LOL.
I did not want to deal with the Blues, Bruins, Hawks and Flames or Oilers. Just because that seems wrong to me for Vancouver.

Washington was willing to give me Kuznetsova and Djoos in one deal but I wanted Schmidt (The other young dman) and they would not make it happen.

San Jose--would not give me Nieto or Hertl who I Would have preferred in the deal, but I love Mirco Muller, so that will help me.

All i know is if Trouba and Scheiffle do not do well for me, I am dead.
User avatar
Vadim10
TBL Rosters Researcher
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 8:03 pm
Favourite Team: Adler Mannheim / VER Selb
Location: Selb, Franconia

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Vadim10 »

I was not so lucky in trading, but I think I could get a few helpful draft picks - at least I hope so.

In reward I got Zachary Fucale, Filip Forsberg, Maxime Lagacé, Radek Faksa, Boone Jenner, a 2nd rounder, 4x 3rd, 4x 4th and 2x 5th. I hope Jenner will develop well as a center, but I fear this will be my big weakness this season besides lacking a good first D-pairing.

The draft lottery went not really good, as I drafted at #12 (hey, didn't I see that somewhere else? :-D) and I didn't manage to get a good goalie prospect drafted.
User avatar
Peter_Doherty
Hall of Fame
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:39 pm
Favourite Team: New York Rangers
Location: Sweden

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by Peter_Doherty »

I tried to make deals for Muller and Scheifele aswell but couldn't find any deal i was happy with, who more then the Sedins did you have to send to Jets to make that deal? Edler? Or even 2 more players?

I could have gotten Burakovsky + Schmidt from Caps but i just really wanted Kreider so i took him instead, for the Sedins ofc.. Harder to find a good deal for the Sedins then i anticipated i must say. I also got a trade vetoed, managed a really good deal for Yakupov but Oilers vetoed it, probably a good thing since that trade would have been highway robbery.

Just went through the draft and i drafted Marner at #12, #20 Kylington, #25 White, #30 Provorov, #42 Andersson. Happy with that draft, filled up on defencemen.

My most likely lineup to start the season is probably this:

Girgensons-Bjugstad-Kreider
Bärtschi-Bonino-Conacher
Lowry-Tierney-Jensen -------------------------------- I will give a O'Reilly and some of the prospects a shot at the lineup so this is far from set in stone.
Matthias-Acton-Kassian ---------------------------------- Not really a fan of that 3rd line so we'll see, it's too young, will probably change some stuff.
Vey, Dorsett, McMillan

My Defence i honestly have no idea how it will look, feel like i have about 10 D-men who are about the same, will see after camp. My gut says this;

Stanton-Tanev
Klefbom-Weber
Olsen-Clendenning/Sanguinetti

But Sbisa and Tömmerness are in with a shot aswell, all i know is that i will probably have my D on equal for the first half of the season until i know who delivers.
Last edited by Peter_Doherty on Thu May 28, 2015 12:58 am, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
elrune1988
Drafted
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 2:19 am

Re: Challenge #37 Discussion - Blowing Up The Canucks!

Post by elrune1988 »

I am going to participate this time around. My first time in a challenge
Post Reply