Moderator: Challenge Moderators
So now Washington have Kolzig (NTC) and Khabby's untradeable 6.75 mil. 
Now I need to accept one of the deals I have in place for a capable G to share the load with Lalime...
Why you hatin' on the Wings man?! But anyway, it's a shared affiliation. But I have rarely ever been able to assign players to the ECHL due to the roster restrictions. ECHL teams can only have 1 or 2 spare parts on the roster and they always fill out a complete roster (unlike in EHM 2005 where some ECHL teams would ice only half a team). It was fun playing in the E in 2005. Just having a full complement of players put you miles ahead of the rest of the league. But back on topic. IMO this is a wasted affiliation since you can't actually get players to that team unless you just happen to catch them with a spot open, which is exceedingly rare.thunderbug wrote:So do we share Toledo with the deadthings or are they just trying to take all my prospects spots in Toledo
Or maybe 'cause Dinger jump him on the opening faceoff. 
It's easy to build a super team - we've all done it before and won our fair share of Cups and awards. What we're looking for here is some honest, friendly competition; within the TBL rules - which we feel make things a little more 'Challenging'. If that's what you're looking for, great! But as I mentioned above, we frown upon cheaters. 
And we have ways to catch you....
I already posted it above. Should I just hold onto them until the end and wait to see if anyone misses their mark? Another question: How do suspensions count (i.e. do we need a SS) toward the games played requirement? I had Havalt suspended for 2 for a really bad penalty. Hope it doesn't become an issue, but want to make sure the little bugger doesn't shaft me in the end. No pun intendedbruins72 wrote:Make sure to save that screenshot of his injury and post it with your other screenshots at the end of the season so you can show why he didn't meet his minimum games for the season (if he doesn't meet them anyway).
Most suspensions are only for a game or two. I don't really think you could use that as a reason for missing your games played requirement. In the first season Group A is only required to play 55 games. The only way I could see suspensions factoring into that is if you had a long term suspension, several shorter ones, or had a couple in conjunction with injuries. For the most part though, suspensions won't matter.Hypnotist wrote:I already posted it above. Should I just hold onto them until the end and wait to see if anyone misses their mark? Another question: How do suspensions count (i.e. do we need a SS) toward the games played requirement? I had Havalt suspended for 2 for a really bad penalty. Hope it doesn't become an issue, but want to make sure the little bugger doesn't shaft me in the end. No pun intendedbruins72 wrote:Make sure to save that screenshot of his injury and post it with your other screenshots at the end of the season so you can show why he didn't meet his minimum games for the season (if he doesn't meet them anyway).
Yeah my team is quite streaky as well. Finished the 2nd set of games with a very solid record of 14-3-3 but the third is already a disaster again.bruins72 wrote:I hear ya! I got 12 wins last time around. So far my second set of 20 games is looking a bit better but it's been a struggle. I go through hot and cold spells. After leaning on Lalime for the majority of the games so far, he's starting to come back down to earth. Looks like I've got to cross my fingers and hope Boucher can win some games. My other problem has been injuries. I haven't hit any major ones but I lose guys for anywhere between a few days and 10 days.
](./images/smilies/wallbash.gif "Brick wall"){kind=small}
