
I kind of wish I had drafted another goalie. Having 3 puts you in a position of power.

I loved the reaction of everyone in the draft. Waiting for Archies autopick to inevitably draft Crosby 3rd overall. But No! Archie takes the headlines. Love it!bruins72 wrote:There's nothing wrong with Zetterberg. He's definitely a great player to have. But to draft him over Crosby? I still don't get that one.
Actually, it's 11 votes to veto a trade.ALSO. just a note...there is a box top right on ESPN page where you need to go to approve/decline other people's trades. Appears 11 votes needed to pass.
Heh I made the assumption Crosby would go in the first pick so didn't bother ranking him right at the top. Looking back, it wouldn't have done any harm to have him at the top even if someone beat me to it. A bit of a rookie mistake! Hopefully my moment of madness will prove to be a moment of genius by the end of the seasongetzlaf15 wrote:I loved the reaction of everyone in the draft. Waiting for Archies autopick to inevitably draft Crosby 3rd overall. But No! Archie takes the headlines. Love it!bruins72 wrote:There's nothing wrong with Zetterberg. He's definitely a great player to have. But to draft him over Crosby? I still don't get that one.
Uups.LoXish wrote:First of all, Devils, Mason plays for the Blues.
Secondly, I have MAF, DiPietro and Mason, if anyone is feeling a need for a goalie.
Well, I was gonna reject it without a second thought, but mathematically there's only room for 30 real starters in the NHL and we've got a minimum of 40 goalie spots in our league. So, having two sure starters and one regular backup would be a bit greedy of me.batdad wrote:What a nice mod you are.Such a gift...the Laffs starting loser.
At least you onlt got a Newfie for him. Mind you, he is the only Newfie player to hoist the Stanley Cup.
Does that make it greedy of me, too?B. Stinson wrote:Well, I was gonna reject it without a second thought, but mathematically there's only room for 30 real starters in the NHL and we've got a minimum of 40 goalie spots in our league. So, having two sure starters and one regular backup would be a bit greedy of me.batdad wrote:What a nice mod you are.Such a gift...the Laffs starting loser.
At least you onlt got a Newfie for him. Mind you, he is the only Newfie player to hoist the Stanley Cup.
Not if you don't think so. Here's how it breaks down, kind of:LoXish wrote:Does that make it greedy of me, too?B. Stinson wrote:Well, I was gonna reject it without a second thought, but mathematically there's only room for 30 real starters in the NHL and we've got a minimum of 40 goalie spots in our league. So, having two sure starters and one regular backup would be a bit greedy of me.batdad wrote:What a nice mod you are.Such a gift...the Laffs starting loser.
At least you onlt got a Newfie for him. Mind you, he is the only Newfie player to hoist the Stanley Cup.