All general EHM-related discussion goes here. It's the place to chat about gameplay, online gameplay or concepts NOT related to specific topics. Claim bragging rights and impress the community by posting your records! CLICK HERE to purchase your copy of EHM 1.
Forum rules Data Editing Forum: Editing the game, databases or saved games. Home of the EHM Editor and the EHM Assistant.
Game Add-ons Forum: Database projects, graphics and sounds. Any discussion which does not relate to editing databases or saved games.
Rosters Forum: Discussion relating to all database and roster projects for Eastside Hockey Manager.
Technical Support: Difficulties, crashes and errors when installing or running the game (and nothing else). Any issues relating to the TBL Rosters must be posted in the TBL Rosters forum. Questions about how to install add-ons must be posted in the Game Add-ons Forum.
General EHM Chat: Anything relating to Eastside Hockey Manager 2004 / 2005 / 2007 / 1 which does not fall within any of the other forums.
Please carry out a forum search before you start a new thread.
Hi guys
I am commissioner of an ehm 2005 league.
A poster recently made a startling assertion that caught us by surprise.
He suggested that players CA/PA can fluctuate depending on news in the game. He suggested the following:
Coach/GM praises news item raises the players CA +10
GM/Scout has doubts about player PA -10
None scouted player scout praises PA +10-20
GM? Player not worthy of ice time CA-10-20 and PA-10-20
Fans unhappy with Player on Roster CA -20 / PA -20
camp notes
not worthy of future look PA caps off at +20 on current CA maxed at 11x x= player style see editor or ehm readme/web guides
needs time to develop no change to CA, PA +0-20 depends what the rest of the line says
Ready to step in CA raised 10-20 and no penalty to PA
These were what I was able to find in about 2 hours of google joy followed by 4 hours of trojan/spyware cleaning afterward, darn web link to unsecured sites
Never heard of something like this. But it's a long time ago that i played the 2005 version of the game. I think if this would be true a player could fluctuate into a zero in no time. And it never happened ot my team that one player would drop so quick.
Complete nonsense. I tried to talk Riz once or twice into introducing some variability to PA via occasional random adjustments, but it never happened. And the numbers he's suggesting are ridiculous - 20 points off CA just because the fans are unhappy with a player?
