Gap Control?
Forum rules
Data Editing Forum: Editing the game, databases or saved games. Home of the EHM Editor and the EHM Assistant.
Game Add-ons Forum: Database projects, graphics and sounds. Any discussion which does not relate to editing databases or saved games.
Game Knowledge Discussion: Attributes, coaching, drafting, scouting, tactics and training/practice.
Rosters Forum: Discussion relating to all database and roster projects for Eastside Hockey Manager.
Technical Support: Difficulties, crashes and errors when installing or running the game (and nothing else). Any issues relating to the TBL Rosters must be posted in the TBL Rosters forum. Questions about how to install add-ons must be posted in the Game Add-ons Forum.
General EHM Chat: Anything relating to Eastside Hockey Manager 2004 / 2005 / 2007 / 1 which does not fall within any of the other forums.
Please carry out a forum search before you start a new thread.
Data Editing Forum: Editing the game, databases or saved games. Home of the EHM Editor and the EHM Assistant.
Game Add-ons Forum: Database projects, graphics and sounds. Any discussion which does not relate to editing databases or saved games.
Game Knowledge Discussion: Attributes, coaching, drafting, scouting, tactics and training/practice.
Rosters Forum: Discussion relating to all database and roster projects for Eastside Hockey Manager.
Technical Support: Difficulties, crashes and errors when installing or running the game (and nothing else). Any issues relating to the TBL Rosters must be posted in the TBL Rosters forum. Questions about how to install add-ons must be posted in the Game Add-ons Forum.
General EHM Chat: Anything relating to Eastside Hockey Manager 2004 / 2005 / 2007 / 1 which does not fall within any of the other forums.
Please carry out a forum search before you start a new thread.
-
- Junior League
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 7:30 am
Gap Control?
Sorry in advance if this has already been discussed. I did a 'search' and didnt see anything, so i thought i would take a shot and ask: what exactly IS 'gap control'? And what does it do if i tighten or relax it? And while i am here , i have a second question, which may also have been covered: If i do NOT have the 'Use Unit Tactics' box checked, will the game default to the 'personal tactics' i have set for each playor? Thanks for any responses!
-
- Junior League
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:30 pm
- Location: Long Island, New York
Yup, that's exactly what it is.Wroom wrote:Isn't it the gap between your players playing defence towards the opponents offensive attack?
If you have a tight gap control you'd need speedy defensemen that have a high pokecheck stat. If you do a loose gap control that means the d-man won't really pursue the guy rushing and will stay back.
-
- Junior League
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 7:30 am
ah, i think i get it then, thanks! I wasnt sure if it was that, or if it was how much space an attacker would allow between him and a teammate before he would no longer make a pass to another teammate. ha! So the best guys to have a tightened gap control would be higher rated checkers, with poke checking ability high and speedy, whereas the ones you want with relaxed gap would be guys with high positioning skills and slower?
- archibalduk
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 20373
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:44 pm
- Custom Rank: Seaside + Fruit Juice Mode
- Favourite Team: Guildford (EPL) / Invicta (NIHL)
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
If you play a tight gap control, your players will stay very close/tight to the opposition puck carrier when you're on the defence.
The advantages are that it will put great pressure on the opposition puck carrier, there is a better chance of forcing them into mistakes, and they will have less time to control the puck and make a play.
The disadvantage is that if the puck carrier gets past your defenceman, the puck carrier will be free and your defenceman will be out of position. It will also be quite tiring and physically demanding.
A particularly useful attribute will be "checking" (i.e. the ability to shadow the opposition player and force the puck off the puck carrier). Obviously, pokechecking and stamina will be important too. It would help if the defenceman is speedy so that he can quickly close the gap on the puck carrier and also to get back into position in case the puck carrier gets past him.
Playing a relaxed gap control will mean the defencemen will hang back from the puck carrier and close the angles instead. This will enable your defencemen to stay in position but it'll be much harder to turnover the puck from the carrier as you're not forcing them into making mistakes.
I've tended to find I get best results from normal gap control. I find I start conceding goals if I increase or decrease the gap - perhaps this is because I've never gotten the correct mix of players to pull this off.
Can anybody explain the difference between "gap control" and "pressure"? I've always thought there's quite an overlap between the two. Perhaps gap control is more to do with the pressurising the puck carrier whereas pressure is pressuring all of the opposition players in general?
The advantages are that it will put great pressure on the opposition puck carrier, there is a better chance of forcing them into mistakes, and they will have less time to control the puck and make a play.
The disadvantage is that if the puck carrier gets past your defenceman, the puck carrier will be free and your defenceman will be out of position. It will also be quite tiring and physically demanding.
A particularly useful attribute will be "checking" (i.e. the ability to shadow the opposition player and force the puck off the puck carrier). Obviously, pokechecking and stamina will be important too. It would help if the defenceman is speedy so that he can quickly close the gap on the puck carrier and also to get back into position in case the puck carrier gets past him.
Playing a relaxed gap control will mean the defencemen will hang back from the puck carrier and close the angles instead. This will enable your defencemen to stay in position but it'll be much harder to turnover the puck from the carrier as you're not forcing them into making mistakes.
I've tended to find I get best results from normal gap control. I find I start conceding goals if I increase or decrease the gap - perhaps this is because I've never gotten the correct mix of players to pull this off.

Can anybody explain the difference between "gap control" and "pressure"? I've always thought there's quite an overlap between the two. Perhaps gap control is more to do with the pressurising the puck carrier whereas pressure is pressuring all of the opposition players in general?

- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
Gap control is how close you cover the opposing player. A slower player with good positioning might give him a good bit of room, knowing that he will lose a straight up foot race but if he hangs back and covers his angles he should be able to make up for that lack of speed. A fast player might play very tight so that he's practically on top of him.
Pressure is more about how hard your are trying to make the opposing player turn over the puck. If the player doesn't have the appropriate attributes to really put on high pressure, they could end up making some mistakes and taking shortcuts like slashing or hooking and getting penalized.
This is discussed a bit (along with the attributes that affect these) in some posts in the Even Strength Tactics thread.
Pressure is more about how hard your are trying to make the opposing player turn over the puck. If the player doesn't have the appropriate attributes to really put on high pressure, they could end up making some mistakes and taking shortcuts like slashing or hooking and getting penalized.
This is discussed a bit (along with the attributes that affect these) in some posts in the Even Strength Tactics thread.
-
- Junior League
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:28 pm
My forwards have decent speeds. Most are over 80 and a couple are over 90 (speed). My defense are mostly over 70 with bouwmeester being a burner at 94.
I just called up Marc Staal. He has 92 positioning and 80 something poke check. He has good endurance at 90+ but his speed is just awful at 51-56… how should I compensate/use him? Should I pair him with another blazer? Should I set the gap control for the line at loose?
I just called up Marc Staal. He has 92 positioning and 80 something poke check. He has good endurance at 90+ but his speed is just awful at 51-56… how should I compensate/use him? Should I pair him with another blazer? Should I set the gap control for the line at loose?
- bruins72
- TBL Admin Team
- Posts: 14513
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:13 pm
- Custom Rank: Challenge Guy
- Favourite Team: Boston Bruins
- Location: Taunton, MA
- RomaGoth
- Fringe Player
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:42 pm
- Favourite Team: Detroit Red Wings
- Location: The Internet
This is the main reason I rarely ever go after Marc Staal. His speed rating is horrid, and I love my speed.masarume wrote:I just called up Marc Staal. He has 92 positioning and 80 something poke check. He has good endurance at 90+ but his speed is just awful at 51-56… how should I compensate/use him? Should I pair him with another blazer? Should I set the gap control for the line at loose?

-
- Junior League
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:28 pm
I was hoping that Staal would turn into a chris pronger type player. Pronger was not that fast when he first started…
The Lidas roster update gave him a speed rating of 77 (He’s 35 in year 3) so I figured if Staal could hit 66 by 28, (he varies b/w 51-56 in the AHL after two years).. he’d be a good #3/4 guy to have. At age 23, his defensive attributes are pretty decent and his offense is coming along… most are in the 70’s with a couple in the 60’s.
The Lidas roster update gave him a speed rating of 77 (He’s 35 in year 3) so I figured if Staal could hit 66 by 28, (he varies b/w 51-56 in the AHL after two years).. he’d be a good #3/4 guy to have. At age 23, his defensive attributes are pretty decent and his offense is coming along… most are in the 70’s with a couple in the 60’s.