archibalduk wrote:I'll give it a try this weekend and will let you know. I recently upgraded my laptop from a 2.0ghz Core 2 Duo, 3gb RAM to an i7 2.0ghz quad with 6gb RAM.
I found a spare 20 mins this evening to give it a go. It seems to be quite a lot quicker. I loaded up a game with the "full" database setting and with the NHL set to "enhanced" and the AHL, CHL, ECHL, UHL, OHL, QMJHL and WHL as "standard". On a vacation game, it took roughly 7 mins to sim a month during the regular season. Running this number of leagues on my i7 was certainly quicker than my Core 2 Duo running just NHL "enhanced" and perhaps two additional leagues as "standard".
I'm not sure how much the additional RAM was really an advantage. On the Task Manager, my RAM usage was approx 1.85gb. I guess maybe the fact I now have dual channel RAM
might make a
slight difference, but I do wonder whether there's really any advantage to having more than 2 or 3gb RAM when running EHM.
The 2.0ghz i7 quad is a big advantage over the 2.0ghz Core 2 Duo however. The CPU usage on the Task Manager didn't go above 14% or 15%. According to the Turbo Boost Monitor/Widget it took advantage of the second generation i7 Turbo Boost (which allows it to run at 2.9ghz for short burst/periods of time). It also only needed to run two of its cores (presumably EHM wasn't programmed to use multi-core processing). It makes me wonder whether say an i3 or i5 would run just as quick as the i7 with EHM. Either way, I think clock speed is going to be more important for performance in EHM rather than having more than two cores - I'm quite sure EHM wasn't designed to take advantage of multi core processors. Thus I wonder whether a 2.5ghz i5 would be faster with EHM than my 2.0ghz i7 - I wouldn't be expert enough to say though
