Geek Hockey (General Discussion)

Post by **Calv** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:59 pm

another loss

get it sorted cap'in!

Post by **batdad** » Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:22 pm

archibalduk wrote:B72 - when Batdad is on the ice, aim for the shins!

not too worried . The way you guys aim for the net..you will miss me and hit Helmer. Then we get a new goalie!! WAHOO!!!

or even better...yourselves.

bruins72 · Post by **bruins72** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:43 am

archibalduk wrote:B72 - when Batdad is on the ice, aim for the shins!

Nah, I'll go for the knees!

Post by **batdad** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:50 am

Poor Joe..it will hurt when you hit his ankle.

Sbufkle · Post by **Sbufkle** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:18 pm

3 goals against??? Man.. whats up with that!!!???

Ill have to take a few extra shots in practice this week.

Post by **batdad** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:43 pm

Nah..you will get a ton on the weekend. You are only the top goalie cause you ain't faced me. Just rest yourself this week. You will get all the practice you need in the game!!

vissia · Post by **vissia** » Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:03 pm

I don't think offensive D works in this little geeky game. Capt, please change my attributes as you see fit if we lose another game again.....

Post by **archibalduk** » Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:09 pm

I wouldn't say offensive D doesn't work. Timmi (Hartford LD) is averaging a goal and an assist every game - he plays aggressive. There's only two defencemen who haven't scored a point - they're both Quebec players. This is because they have very low offensive stats. You've got five points in the three games we've played so far - pretty good for a defenceman.

It really depends on the skills of your team mates. If your fellow D-man has strong defensive stats then he will be able to cover you while you go further up ice and create chances. Also, there's no point in playing aggressively unless you are good at passing and/or shooting.

Sbufkle · Post by **Sbufkle** » Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:12 pm

batdad wrote:Nah..you will get a ton on the weekend. You are only the top goalie cause you ain't faced me. Just rest yourself this week. You will get all the practice you need in the game!!

eyeing hot chicks in the crowd because were always in your end isnt really 'practice'

Post by **batdad** » Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:15 pm

I don't think my team has ever been in my end. Sometimes..on average 5 per game..the other team has managed to hit the net when they ice the puck...and oops Helmer pulls a Cloutier/Ellis

Post by **archibalduk** » Sun May 04, 2008 10:53 am

Results

QBC 3 v 4 HAR
CHI 3 v 5 WIN
MIN 6 v 3 MTL

Code: Select all

				
QBC 3	v	4 HAR		
Archibalduk (2A + 1G)		CatchUp (1A + 1G)		
Loosie (2A + 1G)		Batdad (1A + 1G)		
Bruins72 (2A + 1G)		Gordie Howe (1A + 1G)		
JC Tremblay (0A + 0G)		Timmi611 (1A + 1G)		
Andre Dupont (0A + 0G)		Big Argon (1A + 0G)		
				
CHI 3	v	5 WIN		
Bobby Hull (1A + 1G)		Lazion (2A + 0G)		
Phil Esposito (2A + 1G)		Getzlaf15 (2A + 2G)		
Ryujin (1A + 1G)		Gibson41 (1A + 3G)		
Bobby Orr (1A + 0G)		Serge Savard (0A + 0G)		
Paul Coffey (0A + 0G)		Rookier (1A + 0G)		
				
MIN 6	v	3 MTL		
Loxish (1A + 2G)		Ken Dryden (2A + 1G)		
Devils88 (2A + 2G)		Jacques Lemaire (2A + 1G)		
Marion Gaborik (1A + 1G)		Guy Lafleur (1A + 1G)		
Vissia (1A + 1G)		Larry Robinson (1A + 0G)		
Tasku (1A + 0G)		Jacques Laperriere (1A + 0G)

Standings

Code: Select all

							
…	GP	W	L	T	GF	GA	P
HAR	4	3	1	0	24	19	6
QBC	4	2	1	1	12	9	5
WIN	4	2	2	0	16	16	4
MIN	4	2	2	0	22	23	4
MTL	4	1	2	1	13	17	3
CHI	4	1	3	0	13	16	2

Points

Code: Select all

							
Player	G	A	P				
Loxish	8	6	14
Getzlaf15	7	7	14
Devils88	6	8	14
Batdad	7	6	13
Archibalduk	4	8	12
Gibson41	8	3	11
Marion Gaborik	5	6	11
CatchUp	6	4	10
Gordie Howe	5	5	10
Bobby Hull	5	4	9

+/-

Code: Select all

			
Player	+/-
Timmi611	6
Big Argon	5.75
Andre Dupont	3
JC Tremblay	3
Rookier	1
Serge Savard	0
Tasku	0
Vissia	0
Bobby Orr	-2.5
Paul Coffey	-2.75

GAA

Code: Select all

	
Player	GAA
Sbufkle	2.25
Tony Esposito	4
Calv	4
Patrick Roy	4.25
Joe Helmer	4.75
David Zetterman	5.75

Post by **archibalduk** » Sun May 04, 2008 10:55 am

Code: Select all

								
CHI	Name……………	GS	SS	CH	PC	PA	SH	Ment
LW:	Bobby Hull	0	0	6	5	14	15	a
C :	Phil Esposito	0	0	6	6	14	14	a
RW:	Ryujin	0	0	9	6	13	12	a
LD:	Bobby Orr	0	0	15	15	7	3	a
RD:	Paul Coffey	0	0	15	17	6	2	a
G :	Tony Esposito	10	12	0	0	0	0	a


HAR	Name……………	GS	SS	CH	PC	PA	SH	Ment
LW:	CatchUp	0	0	8	8	10	14	a
C :	Batdad	0	0	4	5	15	16	a
RW:	Gordie Howe	0	0	10	8	12	10	a
LD:	Timmi611	0	0	13	8	8	11	a
RD:	Big Argon	0	0	12	13	8	7	b
G :	Joe Helmer	12	10	0	0	0	0	c

MIN	Name……………	GS	SS	CH	PC	PA	SH	Ment
LW:	Loxish	0	0	4	5	13	18	a
C :	Devils88	0	0	6	6	16	12	a
RW:	Marion Gaborik	0	0	7	9	13	11	a
LD:	Vissia	0	0	10	8	10	12	a
RD:	Tasku	0	0	12	13	10	5	c
G :	David Zetterman	11	11	0	0	0	0	b

MTL	Name……………	GS	SS	CH	PC	PA	SH	Ment
LW:	Ken Dryden	0	0	6	6	14	14	b
C :	Jacques Lemaire	0	0	5	5	15	15	b
RW:	Guy Lafleur	0	0	9	9	11	11	b
LD:	Larry Robinson	0	0	18	12	7	3	b
RD:	Jacques Laperriere	0	0	18	10	8	4	b
G :	Patrick Roy	15	7	0	0	0	0	b

QBC	Name……………	GS	SS	CH	PC	PA	SH	Ment
LW:	Archibalduk	0	0	6	6	18	10	a
C :	Loosie	0	0	7	4	13	16	a
RW:	Bruins72	0	0	7	7	12	14	a
LD:	JC Tremblay	0	0	18	16	3	3	c
RD:	Andre Dupont	0	0	16	18	3	3	c
G :	Sbufkle	14	8	0	0	0	0	a

WIN	Name……………	GS	SS	CH	PC	PA	SH	Ment
LW:	Lazion	0	0	14	11	14	1	a
C :	Getzlaf15	0	0	2	3	18	17	b
RW:	Gibson41	0	0	8	10	5	17	a
LD:	Serge Savard	0	0	15	16	3	6	c
RD:	Rookier	0	0	15	12	11	2	b
G :	Calv	11	11	0	0	0	0	c

Post by **archibalduk** » Sun May 04, 2008 11:13 am

darn it! We were a bit unlucky to lose against the Whalers.

I think we need to use this opportunity to tweak some of our attributes to give us more power in offence. At least our solid defence saw Batdad drop from first place in the table of highest points scorers

Chicago's tie means that they jump ahead of the Habs, who were comprehensively beaten by Minnesota.

Winnepeg's Gibson41 had a fantastic game this week, scoring three goals and making one assist.

Next week is the halfway point in the season. It's still very close but if Hartford beat bottom-placed Chicago then they'll start sneaking ahead of the pack. Come on, Ryujin - you've gotta pull out all the stops this week!

Post by **CatchUp** » Sun May 04, 2008 11:27 am

Whalers are unstoppable!!!:1st:

Post by **batdad** » Sun May 04, 2008 4:55 pm

YOu stopped nothing Archi..MY guy just decided to take one for the team. I think CatchUp and my goalie in particular better remember this when they do nothing but make sure I get 9 points against Chicago!!!

BWAH! HARTFORD RULES!!

bigargon · Post by **bigargon** » Sun May 04, 2008 10:27 pm

Go Whalers!!!!!!

Post by **Calv** » Sun May 04, 2008 11:24 pm

a win

I think our season will really get going from now on!

bruins72 · Post by **bruins72** » Mon May 05, 2008 3:48 am

Archi, if you want to tweak me a little more towards offense, go right ahead. I think I went with a little more of a balanced approach when I created my player.

Post by **joehelmer** » Mon May 05, 2008 8:00 pm

Hey, it seems like we (I) didn't let in too many goals while I was gone.

Hartford is the best!

BTW, you can keep the 'C' on your shirt if you want Batdad or whoever was the captain when I was gone.
Good to have someone to complain to when our team suck.

Post by **batdad** » Mon May 05, 2008 9:26 pm

I don't have the c. Big argon borrowed it.

bigargon · Post by **bigargon** » Mon May 05, 2008 9:52 pm

well we are 2-0 under my reign terror. i can continue if you wish.

Post by **archibalduk** » Tue May 06, 2008 7:43 am

bruins72 wrote:Archi, if you want to tweak me a little more towards offense, go right ahead. I think I went with a little more of a balanced approach when I created my player.

I went with a fairly balanced approach when I created mine too. I think because our defencemen are defensively-minded that it's affecting the number of goals we score. On the other hand, it lets the three forwards concentrate on offence. I'll be sure to tweak the forwards in favour of more offence.

Post by **batdad** » Tue May 06, 2008 7:50 am

Oh I forgot. A-G-G-R-E-S-S-I-V-E of course.

Post by **CatchUp** » Tue May 06, 2008 8:28 am

What? Did someone say aggressive??

Ok. I will go with aggressive.

Post by **joehelmer** » Tue May 06, 2008 10:02 am

What's aggressive?

Conservative!