Low Save Percentage

All general EHM-related discussion goes here. It's the place to chat about gameplay, online gameplay or concepts NOT related to specific topics. Claim bragging rights and impress the community by posting your records! CLICK HERE to purchase your copy of EHM 1.
Forum rules
Data Editing Forum: Editing the game, databases or saved games. Home of the EHM Editor and the EHM Assistant.

Game Add-ons Forum: Database projects, graphics and sounds. Any discussion which does not relate to editing databases or saved games.

Game Knowledge Discussion: Attributes, coaching, drafting, scouting, tactics and training/practice.

Rosters Forum: Discussion relating to all database and roster projects for Eastside Hockey Manager.

Technical Support: Difficulties, crashes and errors when installing or running the game (and nothing else). Any issues relating to the TBL Rosters must be posted in the TBL Rosters forum. Questions about how to install add-ons must be posted in the Game Add-ons Forum.

General EHM Chat: Anything relating to Eastside Hockey Manager 2004 / 2005 / 2007 / 1 which does not fall within any of the other forums.

Please carry out a forum search before you start a new thread.
Post Reply
Geld1941
Junior League
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 9:51 pm

Low Save Percentage

Post by Geld1941 »

I did a forum search but couldn't find anything relating to my query.
I have had many many goalies, some with average skill and some with all 90+skill and it doesn't seem to matter because their save percentage will never rise above .900, mostly in the .880-890 range.

what am i doing wrong that makes my goalies, who when traded move on to .920+, so bad when they play for me?
I have a very defensive team strategy, and star defenders and forwards, but nothing ever seems to work.

thanks for any help you guys can provide.
selne
Second Line
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:58 pm

Re: Low Save Percentage

Post by selne »

Geld1941 wrote:..I have a very defensive team strategy, and star defenders and forwards.
It's probably better to build your tactics around the players you got. Playing defense in general is difficult in EHM. If you have offensive talented players, play offense because as long as they can keep the puck is in the offensive zone, you don't need to worry much about defense. ;)
User avatar
McQwak
Stanley Cup Winner
Posts: 1439
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 1:59 pm
Custom Rank: Now with capital letters!
Location: Prague, Czech rep.

Post by McQwak »

I think it's normal. It's very difficult to have you goalies over .900 percentage. Just adjust your tactics and try to reach it.
But again, it's just normal. Don't hope it's a bug ;)
frisland
Junior League
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:38 pm

Post by frisland »

I usually do not have a problem with keeping my goalies around a .900-.920 save percentage, but i usually concentrate on building a quality d corp. Except recently with that darn Irbe regen failure.... i couldnt get him to not let in 4-5 goals a game.

But on the other hand, i never have anyone in the top 25 in scoring, that most i can hope for is having someone get to the point per game mark.
User avatar
axwel3221
Checking Line
Posts: 522
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by axwel3221 »

frisland wrote:I usually do not have a problem with keeping my goalies around a .900-.920 save percentage, but i usually concentrate on building a quality d corp. Except recently with that darn Irbe regen failure.... i couldnt get him to not let in 4-5 goals a game.

But on the other hand, i never have anyone in the top 25 in scoring, that most i can hope for is having someone get to the point per game mark.
I've had 3 players (1st line :nerd: ) on top 10 points. And same time my goalie in 18 SO and .968 or something, but you need totally all out offense and goalie that must be Brodeur.

My first line was something like Gionta - Gomez - Boyes or some one great playmaker with scoring skills in place of Boyes.


That was something special, never happened after that again... :rant: :-D
User avatar
LarsPGH
Junior League
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:48 am

Geld1941

Post by LarsPGH »

Dude, it must be your tactics but who do you have playing as your top 6 D?
In my league - 2nd season as the Bruins - there are 27 goalies (games played from 12 to 56) with a save percentage over .900, including my Tim Thomas, who is at .909. Rask is at .870, and if he can improve just a little I can trade my $5M starter. Happily.
User avatar
philou21
The Great One
Posts: 9406
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:15 pm
Custom Rank: 24 cups!!!
Favourite Team: Colorado Avalanche
Location: Trois-Rivières, Québec

Post by philou21 »

How much shot you receive per game? Sometimes, the goalie will perform well with 25 + shots per game. If he receive only 15-18 shot he can be less concentrate and make mistakes so it makes bad performances.

Check that, I always try to have my goalie saying that he likes the style of play of my team. I never got problems with is performances with that.
cm_spitfire
Prospect
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:30 am

Post by cm_spitfire »

I can relate to this post. I haemmorhage goals at an awful rate currently but it seems that I can score more than them. It doesn't lead to very good stats for the goalie (and some +/-) but you still win. Obviously, I'd prefer to win AND have good goalie stats!
k13
Junior League
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:24 pm

Post by k13 »

Have the same thing with MAF.

I remember it was rare to get shutouts in 2005, even the cpu but in 2007 the cpu has 10+ shutouts for the season all the time, kind of lame
capschmap
Top Prospect
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:06 pm

Post by capschmap »

Another thing to factor is how relative this sv pc is to other goalies in the league. I've had years where my goalies finished with a sv pc of 905 or something similar, and they're among the top 10 in the league. :-?
Post Reply